« The Letters Are Coming, The Letters Are Coming | Main | Glen Ridgers Pushing Petitions »

Bloomfield Won't Take No For An Answer

Friday, October 27, 2006

The fight over eminent domain continues as Bloomfield township makes another play for its $160 million redevelopment plan. The plan has been rejected twice in the courtroom - once in August 2005, and again in August 2006. Now another appeal has been filed, which if accepted could take the case to New Jersey Supreme Court. From The Independent Press:

Attorney Catherine Tamasik said that the township had filed the petition for certification of the appeal to the last decision on Sept. 27. The attorneys for defendant 110 Washington Street Associates, the firm Carlin and Ward, have filed the response brief to the petition. The paperwork that remains is the township’s reply, to be submitted later this month.

But that’s as much as anyone can foresee. Tamasik said that the likelihood of the Supreme Court hearing the case — let alone the outcome — is undetermined. The Court could even take a year to decide whether or not to hear the appeal, and even then could decide against taking it on at all.

At the same time, the township planning board and council have adopted changes to the redevelopment area study, in an attempt to justify characterizing the area as blighted. Tamasik also mentioned that the negotiations with the holdout shop and property owners are ongoing, and that Forest City remains committed to the project — despite being stripped of the rights to develop the planned Parcel 4 condominium units on which the 110 Washington Street address lies.
Posted by Annette Batson on October 27, 2006 10:07 AM
Email this story |
 

So is the town (aka taxpayers) paying the legal bills or is the developer?

Posted by hrhppg | October 27, 2006 10:20 AM
 

What doesn't the council and mayor understand?!? And all the while mucking around the courts. I don't think most Bloomfielder's wants the town to have or use eminent domain in this way. Geewiz, how thick can you be?!?

Posted by lasermike026 | October 27, 2006 11:16 AM
 

This was actually last week's news. In any case, The re-developer, Forest City, picks up the tab for the legal challenges.

Posted by Anonymous | October 27, 2006 12:12 PM
 

This was actually last week's news. In any case, The re-developer, Forest City, picks up the tab for the legal challenges.

Posted by Anonymous | October 27, 2006 12:13 PM
 

really? So Forest City not only gets to use the power of government to sieze the property for their private benefit, they get to sue under cover of a political entity to smash citizens into conforming to their whim?
Pretty sweet deal for them. Do they also get to field an army of Pinkertons men to quash any protest?

Posted by appletony | October 27, 2006 12:24 PM
 

The specter of condemnation hangs over all property. Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory.
—Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

Posted by appletony | October 27, 2006 12:27 PM
 

This week's front page article is about the Board of Education running out of money and having to cut back on the scope of the high school renovation/construction project.

Posted by Amanda Bonner | October 27, 2006 2:17 PM
 

Unfortunately, this ongoing situation of 'pending redevelopment' has blighted the area. Few, if any, businesses would consider this area since the pending litigation and possible loss of space defies good business sense when opening or relocating a business. The vacancy rate, desolate store fronts and subsequent lack of foot traffic would make it very difficult for any one to succeeed if they did decide to open here. Hopefully, some resolution can be found rather than waitng for the litigation to unfold.

Posted by Anonymous | October 27, 2006 5:17 PM
 

Unfortunately, this ongoing situation of 'pending redevelopment' has blighted the area. Few, if any, businesses would consider this area since the pending litigation and possible loss of space defies good business sense when opening or relocating a business. The vacancy rate, desolate store fronts and subsequent lack of foot traffic would make it very difficult for any one to succeeed if they did decide to open here. Hopefully, some resolution can be found rather than waitng for the litigation to unfold.

Posted by Anonymous | October 27, 2006 5:18 PM
 

The hooker house was doing very well, in light of the blight, 'til the law shut it down with all their might! :)

Posted by Sanford | October 27, 2006 5:24 PM
 

Let's see:

1. High school makeover (don't even know where to start with this one),who has the oversight on this gem? You think Enron was mismanaged?

2. Foley Field debacle (well connected contractor does lousy job of fixing the stands, ends up ruining them, requiring replacement), again, nobody answers for this.

3. "Rebirth of Bloomfield center", uh-huh.

Follow the paper trail. Check the NJ state websites to see who donates to whom and who benefits.

People who donate to the powers that be do well; taxpayers foot the bill.

What's not to like?
Bloomfield is up for sale.

Posted by Bye Bye Bloomfield | October 28, 2006 2:18 PM
 

Bloomfield Center has always been just short of blight, but it could be a lot better. Couldn't the town find SOMEWHERE for these angry shop owners to go to make it right for them? For those who are waiving flags of defiance, what town wouldn't want to improve its circumstances in the downtown area? To blindly reject the notion of rehabilitation of a downtown is just stupid. Granted, Bloomfield Township's legal ineptitude probably exascerbated problems with shop owners, but the potential for rebirth of a town is a powerful thing. Right now, parts of the downtown are a wasteland. What now, if the project fails in the courts?

Posted by REF | October 28, 2006 3:04 PM
 

Bloomfield Center has always been just short of blight, but it could be a lot better. Couldn't the town find SOMEWHERE for these angry shop owners to go to make it right for them? For those who are waiving flags of defiance, what town wouldn't want to improve its circumstances in the downtown area? To blindly reject the notion of rehabilitation of a downtown is just stupid. Granted, Bloomfield Township's legal ineptitude probably exascerbated problems with shop owners, but the potential for rebirth of a town is a powerful thing. Right now, parts of the downtown are a wasteland. What now, if the project fails in the courts?

Posted by REF | October 28, 2006 3:05 PM
 

The sad thing is, if none of this had been planned and the market had gone its merry way as it has, and Midtown Direct made the whole area pick up, I'm sure these empty shops would have something in them by now. But Hiding's point above is true - the pending redevelopment is preventing the natural redevelopment that might have taken place otherwise. Look at Senorita's, it's doing great. There might have been more things like that if this wasn't hanging over the heads of everyone in the area. I was in favor of the redevelopment at the time it was originally proposed. Now that 5 years have passed and times have changed, I feel it is a mistake and yet it seems as if Bloomfield is locked into it and can't get out of it.

Posted by Mauigirl52 | October 28, 2006 11:46 PM
 

Adriana O'Toole Homes

Joe Bartoni's








Weather
Movies
TV

Gmail
NJ Transit
DeCamp
People Search
Google Maps
Dictionary
Google News
Homeland Security
Essex County News
High School Sports
» MONTCLAIR LINKS
ABOUT
Official Montclair Website
Montclair Center
Montclair Schools
Montclair Community Pre-K
Montclair State University
American Towns
Town Profile
THE ARTS
Arts Montclair
Montclair Art Museum
Montclair Arts Council
Peak Performances
Youth Orchestras of Essex County
ATTRACTIONS
New Jersey Jackals
Presby Iris Gardens
Van Vleck Gardens
COMMUNITY
Montclair Adult School
Montclair Public Library
Montclair YMCA
Mountainside Health Foundation
Red Cross
Toni's Kitchen
COMMUTING
The Clever Commute
Montclair-Boonton Line Train Schedule
FORUMS/BLOGS
Montclair Journal
Montclair Watercooler
Montclair Unmoderated
NJ.com Montclair Forum
ORGANIZATIONS
Bike Montclair
Brookdale Park Conservancy
Friends of Anderson Park
League of Women Voters of the Montclair Area
MEWS
Montclair Engineers
MFEE/Montclair Reads
Montclair Fund for Women
Montclair Historical Society
Montclair PTA
Montclair Wildlife
Outpost in the Burbs
OTHER
New Jersey Life and Leisure
VillageRadio

» GLEN RIDGE LINKS
» BLOOMFIELD LINKS
» OUTER BARISTAVILLE
» OF INTEREST BLOGS
BARISTAS
jjschiffer.com
Madeleine Bake Shop
Politics of Place
Read Me, Love Me, Buy the Book
stopkatie.com
Wanderful!!!
ARTISTS

Artisan Studio Underground
Artist / Blacksmith Charlie Spademan
Dust and Rust
habit-image-reaction
I Will Kick Your Ass For World Peace
Regia Richest
CULTURE
La Tertulia
FOOD
Cat Food
Chowhound
Hungry Chef
Mano a Vino
Table Hopping with Rosie
FORUMS
E-gullet NJ
Springsteen Forum
GARDENING
The Gardeners Apprentice
The Gardening Guru
GO GREEN
Green Jersey
Reuse and Recycle in Montclair
HEALTH
Medicana
NEW JERSEY
Bada Bing Blog
Blog Net News NJ
Jersey Side
NJ.com
NJHotShots
NJ My Way
Weird NJ
OF USE
Craig's List NJ
PetFinder
Urban Dictionary
PARENTING
Dante's Inferno with Children
FinSlippy
Looky Daddy
The Mamahood
Raisinology
Who's the Grown Up?
PERSONAL
55 Secret Street
Anovelista
CarreFemme
The Daily Doormatt
Detox Moxie
I Hate Decamp
Inclusive Ceremonies
Man With a Pen
Martta's World
Maui Girl's Meanderings
The Media Drop
Meg McGonagall
MOM & Pop Culture
My Life as a Rabid Blog
Richieville
RZ's Blog
Tina Bell
Snake Oil Sam
The Society for Conscious Craft
Wellness Woman
Yenta Diva
POLITICAL
Gold Finch Tech
New Jersey Politics Unusual
REAL ESTATE
Crystal Ball Real Estate
Eco Realty
TECHNOLOGY
We Give Good Tech

Email us to link your blog