« Teens Mugging Teens | Main | Perv Prevention »

Another Montclair Teardown!

Thursday, February 8, 2007

354Orange-frontcloseup.jpg354Orange-hiding2.jpg

This week, Montclair town council passed another resolution to nominate 354 Orange Road as historic. The only "no" vote against the nomination was from councilor Joyce Michaelson. Unfortunately, it was too little too late. The building had a demo permit granted back in October, but council seems to have dropped the ball on this one, picking it up this week.

Yesterday morning, the house (above) was standing. Drive by today and you'll see it's been demolished.

Oh -- and the owners of the property? Van Note, again, who must have ran over yesterday afternoon to get the building demolished. The "land" is listed for $1,275,000, with a call for developers to come calling. It joins 21 North Mountain as another vacant eyesore.

Phil Read is on the story with us, and he picked up on the fact that councilors all jockeying to take credit for the nomination (now moot) and their dysfunctional relationships, may be to blame for why this act of preservation failed miserably. We actually have a chain of emails showing that council appeared to just find out about this property days ago, despite the demo permit. Who the hell is minding the store, folks?

An April 1980 Preservation Montclair survey of homes lists 354 Orange Road, with its Queen Anne elements, as a "possible" candidate for listing on an historic register.

The resolution itself seemed to greet some councilors by surprise and led to a pointed back-and-forth between Lang and at-large councilor Ted Mattox, who in a lawsuit accuses his colleagues of skirting public bidding laws and violating state ethics rules.

"There's a 4th Ward councilor," Lang said to Mattox as she advanced the resolution during the pre-meeting conference.

"Is there?" said Mattox, indicating he knew about the property and was prepared to nominate it. "So you're nominating a property you don't know anything about?"

"Balderdash," Lang said.

354Orange-front%20tower.jpg
Nice turret, now no more...
Crushed%3Afront.jpgCrushed%3ARight.jpg
Crushed%3AGone.jpg
Posted by Liz George on February 8, 2007 8:25 AM
Email this story |
 

WHAT A NIGHTMARE!!!!

Posted by FGG | February 8, 2007 8:37 AM
 

Whether the house has any historic importance may be up for debate, but it seems like Montclair is asleep at the wheel here. The fact that nobody botthered to find out one way or another until it was too late is a clear sign on ineptitude.

Unfortunately, its the Montclair residents that have to live with it. at leats for now.

Posted by My Name is Tyler Durden | February 8, 2007 8:41 AM
 

Vote with yourpockbook. Keep listing of the Real Estate Companies that are doing this, and when you need to sell or buy property avoid them. As a private owner of your property can can allow in or turn away from showing, anyone you wish. Those who buy these old mansions and tear them down, should be turned away from showing your home. YOU have the right ! Use it!

Posted by Say One | February 8, 2007 8:42 AM
 

Someone remind me why I bought a house in Montclair again?

Posted by embarrassed | February 8, 2007 8:43 AM
 

Can we see the chain of emails?

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 8:44 AM
 

"" Someone remind me why I bought a house in Montclair again? ""

1.) Status
2.) Perception and belief Montclair was a superior town in which to raise a family. In many ways, you were correct in your thinking.
3.) You got lost looking for Livingston and/or Millburn.

Posted by Sanford | February 8, 2007 9:10 AM
 

"...they paved paradise and put up a parking lot...."

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:12 AM
 

"...they paved paradise and put up a parking lot...."

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:12 AM
 

Oh well. The remedy is not to run around willy-nilly, trying to prevent teardowns on a one-off basis: the town should either move decisively and ahead of time to create historic districts with special rules (as they've done with the historic commercial districts), or suffer the consequences.

The Van Note supporters in the Duryea house episode spoke glowingly of the wonderful houses he builds. His revamping of the Duryea Rd. house looks stunning from the outside. Now we all will get to see first hand what he does when not constrained by advance community pressure.

Posted by appletony | February 8, 2007 9:13 AM
 

This is becoming ridiculous. Maybe we need to institute an HPC of some sort, similar to Glen Ridge, or Roseland, which are are notorious for not allowing people to run roughshod over people and neighborhoods. Maybe every single building permit application needs to be reviewed by a commission for appropriateness. How do these things slip by?

Conversely, when we applied for a permit to build an addition, we had to argue with Montclair's planning people for about 3 months over whether or not the front porch should extend the full width of the house, and then they told us we weren't permitted to trim back a tree in the backyard to accommodate the commission's proposed changes. And we were delayed at least twice because not all the commissioners showed up at all the meetings. What gives? Am I missing something?

Posted by Kay | February 8, 2007 9:19 AM
 

"Maybe we need to institute an HPC of some sort, similar to Glen Ridge, or Roseland, which are are notorious for not allowing people to run roughshod over people and neighborhoods."

No maybe about it. That's exactly what's needed or soon we'll be living in a place that resembles Queens.

Posted by When Will They Stop | February 8, 2007 9:34 AM
 

QQ

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:39 AM
 

Well said Say One. I know someone in Montclair who plans to put their house on the market soon. I will make every effort to convince them to use a realtor who does not do this.

It may be within their rights to knock it down, but it my right to say that it's a pretty slimy way to do business.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 8, 2007 10:06 AM
 

"Phil Read is on the story with us"

Looks like Phil had the whole story. Blame the HPC not the Council; they can't be expected to conduct emergency surgery every time a demo permit is applied for. If the house had major signifigance the HPC should have been proactive. Why doesn't someone get a public referendum on the ballot to ask the citizenry whether they want the HPC to have jurisdicion over the whole town- instead of the unrelenting whining.

Posted by do something | February 8, 2007 10:30 AM
 

I think Say One and State Street Pete are on to something, here. If we make Rhodes Van Note's name synonymous with sleazy business practices, it could make a difference.

What do you say, RVN? How would you like to be lumped in with the likes of Steve Plofker? Think carefully before you check your bank balance.

Posted by Rhodes Van Note: Synonymous w/Sleazebag | February 8, 2007 10:32 AM
 

It will be a cold day in hell before I buy or sell my house using ANYONE associated with VanNote Realtors.

Town Council: WAKE UP!!!

Posted by Backsore | February 8, 2007 10:38 AM
 

I think Say One and State Street Pete are on to something, here. If we make Rhodes Van Note's name synonymous with sleazy business practices, it could make a difference.

What do you say, RVN? How would you like to be lumped in with the likes of Steve Plofker? Think carefully before you check your bank balance.

Posted by Rhodes Van Note: Synonymous w/Sleazebag | February 8, 2007 10:44 AM
 

There is an excellent idea mentioned above to get the message across to the scumbags from Van Note:

When selling your house, buyers represented by Van Note should NOT be permitted to view the house. Buyers are not locked into any realtor...they can use one of the other excellent and honorable real estate agencies in town to look at your house.

Eventually the word will get around with buyers...if you want to see ALL the Montclair listings, don't work with any Van Note realtors.

I am taking the pledge: there will never be a Van Note realtor permitted in my house.

If you do business with Van Note, your house could easily be their next teardown!

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 10:56 AM
 

Be careful what you wish for.

How would you like it if as a result of your sleaze, we go out of our way and pay WAY TOO MUCH, for the property RIGHT NEXT DOOR to your house and put up a "little shack", fully loaded.

Think carefully before you wish others ill, better check your backyard punk.

Posted by A Monster Next Door | February 8, 2007 10:57 AM
 

i think it's a sticky wicket when town governance/historic preservation commission sets down laws/rules/ordinance dictating how private property owners dispose of their property, but i think some measures should be put in place to allow for debate prior to granting demolition permits. perhaps with each permit should be preceded by an official 'waiting period' until the appropriate agencies determine the historic significance/value of a property being sold. but of course, such might hamper a seller's ability to dispose of property, and that's not fair either; it runs the danger of making property in montclair unsaleable. i think we need fariness to everybody here--maybe procedures should be drawn up, then put to voters.

Posted by pegi adam | February 8, 2007 11:03 AM
 

Aren't Realtors who rep the buyer under an obligation to reveal how they are planning on using the property in question? I seem to remember reading that somewhere.

Posted by Push Me Pull You | February 8, 2007 11:03 AM
 

Is "A Monster Next Door" a friend of Van Note's and threatening me?

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 11:20 AM
 

From personal experience, we once had a realtor tell us the buyer was a single mom who wanted to move to Montclair for the schools - about 2 months after she bought the house, she hired shady contractors to do sloppy renovations while still living there, and then immediately rented it out to some folks we were ultimately glad to see move on.

So the short answer is I think the buyer's agent can say whatever the buyer tells them... but probably isn't required to tell you anything... and either way you can't restrict what a buyer actually does with the place after they own it (unless you do some kind of special deeded restriction).

Posted by Kay | February 8, 2007 11:25 AM
 

What really burns me up is it sounds as if Van Note doesn't even have a developer already picked - he just bought this lovely old home on speculation. It is sickening.

By the way, Montclair DOES have a Historic Preservation Commission. But it is governed by the existing ordinances and in order to have more teeth the ordinances would need to be strengthened.

Posted by Mauigirl52 | February 8, 2007 11:33 AM
 

the van notes show their true colors.

Posted by ralph | February 8, 2007 11:33 AM
 

A Monster Next Door,

Too late.

Posted by 352 Orange Road | February 8, 2007 12:00 PM
 

NJ Transit spokespeople Dan Stessel and Penny Bassett Hackett told The Times this week that there is a possibility of weekend rail service on the Montclair-Boonton Line in late 2008.

Posted by Weekend Train Service, It's About time !! | February 8, 2007 12:15 PM
 

late 2008

Posted by right on schedule | February 8, 2007 12:29 PM
 

late 2008? Isn't that rushing things a bit? How about 2080 when we've all turned into ash????

Posted by no reason to rush like gangbusters into weekend train service | February 8, 2007 12:30 PM
 

Screw DeCamp once and for all !!!

Posted by Can't Wait ! | February 8, 2007 12:32 PM
 

Sorry, you'll be ash by 2009.

Posted by Allah Akbar | February 8, 2007 12:34 PM
 

I don't know...NJ transit sure has been sucking lately. Do they not have mechanics? what is with all the broken down trains lately?

Posted by NJT is the 9th circle of hell | February 8, 2007 12:50 PM
 

Hey, now that the property is vacant (or at least, sans house), Montclair should rush to condemn it through eminent domain, and preserve it as open space!

That'll stop the teardowns right quick!

Posted by Pork Roll | February 8, 2007 12:52 PM
 

I have no interest in weekend train service. Oh yeah, and wont do business with Van Note ever.

Posted by jimmy229oz | February 8, 2007 12:54 PM
 

'and preserve it as open space!"

So we can then TURF IT !

Posted by GR JANE | February 8, 2007 12:56 PM
 

Not doing business with Van Note will mostly only effect the agents, who are working folks like everyone else. Montclair is to blame--meaning our rep local government--for allowing a demo permit. Our displeasure should be directed toward them.

Posted by Don't Think So | February 8, 2007 1:04 PM
 

Is that the former Wellmont Theater listed in Baristanet classifieds? Hurry, one of the selling points is the possibility of a subdivision!

Posted by What can we say about that? | February 8, 2007 1:20 PM
 

"Don't Think So" I certainly blame the town for being asleep at the switch. I blame the owner for doing something I find morally questionable.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 8, 2007 1:32 PM
 

I think the Van Note's did the smart thing by tearing down that old house before the likes of Baristanut makes a big deal over nothing. They own the house and have every right to do whatever they want. There are 50 blogs here and I would bet that 48 of you have never even seen this property before or knows exactly where it is. It's sandwiched between two apartments. Where was the town council when those apartments were built and became an eyesore to this property?

Bravo Van Notes, now go build another beautiful house that enhances the entire neighborhood.

Posted by I Love It | February 8, 2007 2:01 PM
 

Here's the deal, you hurt the neighborhood and mess with properity values and then the rules will get harder. Don't abuse the freedom or you'll loose it.

Posted by lasermike026 (laserm at netaxs dot com) | February 8, 2007 2:06 PM
 

"Bravo Van Notes, now go build another beautiful house that enhances the entire neighborhood."

LOL

Make sure the prefabricated 9-story sides of the new house gracefully touch the walls of the ugly aparmtents that sandwich it.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 2:11 PM
 

The Town woke up, moved towards preservation, and Jim Van Note raced to demolish the next day. Van Note is clearly responsible.

No realtor from Van Note will EVER step foot in my house.

The Van Note sales reps can go work for another agency if they ever want my business. I guess Van Note decided historic teardowns were more profitable than brokering houses.

Basically, Van Note got blocked on his teardown in Upper Montclair, so he went to the South End, where apparently he can get away this kind of travesty.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 2:11 PM
 

"Don't abuse the freedom or you'll loose it."

seRGE coming to a ghetto near you.

Soon. VERY SOON

Posted by No here's the deal | February 8, 2007 2:11 PM
 

We have decorum in UPPER MONTCLAIR.

The only logical choice was for serge to move to the South End.

Posted by hello? | February 8, 2007 2:15 PM
 

$10 says that "I Love It" is one of the cronies who supported Van Note when he wanted to demolish 4 Duryea Rd.

Hey buddy, I think there's some brown stuff on your nose...

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 2:19 PM
 

Hiding 2:11,

Van Note had a demo permit from the town. There was nothing underhanded that was done here. And where does it say that this house was "historic"? It was an old house, the town is full of old houses, doesn't mean that its some landmark worthy of a designation. For once, arm yourself with FACTS, not BS and idle rants. Take a drive around town and look at the houses the Van Notes have built and tell me if you can find even one that does not enhance tha character of the neighborhood.

Posted by I Love It | February 8, 2007 2:21 PM
 

$10 ??????

Not worth my time.

Posted by GR JANE | February 8, 2007 2:24 PM
 

Hiding 2:29,

Don't know them personally, but I follow the happenings in Montclair and escpecially the real estate market. I also get a lot of amusement out of watching the town and you slugs fall all over yourselves time and time again. Maybe the town planning board can be a shared service run by Glen Ridge for Montclair and we can get rid of these morons. Put the $10 toward my sewer bill, thanks.

Posted by I Love It | February 8, 2007 2:27 PM
 

I dislike teardowns as much as anyone here, but it appears Van Note was completely within his rights. We need to get over it, and get the HPC involved in designating properties before the 11th hour next time!

Posted by too late for THIS one | February 8, 2007 2:29 PM
 

"Van Note had a demo permit from the town." - that might make it legal, it does not make it right.

When word got out that it might be a Historic building the owner went out of his way to knock it down. To me that's not what a long-time responsible town resident does. You can say it's business, but part of being a good business person is doing right by your community.

Don't get me wrong, the Van Note's have been good citizens of this town up to this, but I think you can tell from the previous posts that folks are pissed.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 8, 2007 2:47 PM
 

morally questionable??... lets not forget that we are talking about a house!!! and again, just like Duryea, Where were all of you when it was on the market? ...not once...but TWICE???
*JUST A LITTLE ADVICE: Next time one of these "Historical" houses go on the market..maybe pull your money together and buy it and then you can do what ever you please with it...UNTIL then...maybe you could find a better or more moral cause to fight for.

Posted by PLEASE | February 8, 2007 2:53 PM
 

^ buddy you just don't get it, and that's fine. Van Note might get it when people start taking their business elsewhere.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 8, 2007 2:59 PM
 

Go find 354 Orange Road (the house, not the land)on the MLS as for sale or sold. Lotsa luck...

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 3:08 PM
 

"Van Note might get it when people start taking their business elsewhere."


Maybe Buddy.

Or the VN may see their business increase because people see their work and like what they do.

Just because a FEW sanctimonious libs here spout all day long about a bank, a house, a Marlboro, an apartment, a hotel, a parking lot, a tear down and oh yeah, my fave Bush didn't stop KATRINA doesn't mean that VN will go out of business tomorrow.

You people are the minority.

These "things" are happening in this town because there is a market for them.

you people don't get it.

Posted by GR JANE | February 8, 2007 3:29 PM
 

GR Jane,

I could not agree with you more. Great, three of you a-holes will move out of town and use Schweppe. That will not hurt that business one bit and it will be a windfall for the rest of the town that three of you are gone!

A piece of shit on a hill between two apartments in an average section of town doesn't sound like a property worthy of historic preservation.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 3:35 PM
 

A piece of shit on a hill between two apartments in an average section of town doesn't sound like a property worthy of historic preservation.

Hope the Van Notes don't talk like that when they try to sell your house. No it would be more like this...

Sip lemonande on the front porch of this lovely Montclair home. Luxuriate under the shade of majestic pine trees in the large backyard, just ready for parties.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 3:54 PM
 

"BALDERDASH!" Classic. As classic as those white hosiery she always wears.
Did you ever hear of such awful tommyrot?

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 5:32 PM
 

HPC is a very positive force in Montclair. But it is not perfect, nor is is it prescient. Amid the new master plan,and I have to give karen Kadus at the Planning office credit, historic properties are being identified in our town and HPC is doing its best to fight for their survival. The current town council ought to be given credit yes I mean credit for seeing the need to preserve out heritage. Bitch about the Mayor all you want but when I was the Chairman of HPC, Ed Remsen was the biggest ally of preservation. I am sick and tired of the bashing he has taken on this webiste. Ed is an honorable man, serving in a position that offers little compensation, and the citizens of Montclair ought to be thankful for what he has accomplished. Rather than assume the worst and all the stupid conspiracy theories realize that he is a real neighbor, accessible and a person that is trying to make this town a better place.

Posted by jmo | February 8, 2007 5:39 PM
 

HPC is a very positive force in Montclair. But it is not perfect, nor is is it prescient. Amid the new master plan,and I have to give karen Kadus at the Planning office credit, historic properties are being identified in our town and HPC is doing its best to fight for their survival. The current town council ought to be given credit yes I mean credit for seeing the need to preserve out heritage. Bitch about the Mayor all you want but when I was the Chairman of HPC, Ed Remsen was the biggest ally of preservation. I am sick and tired of the bashing he has taken on this webiste. Ed is an honorable man, serving in a position that offers little compensation, and the citizens of Montclair ought to be thankful for what he has accomplished. Rather than assume the worst and all the stupid conspiracy theories realize that he is a real neighbor, accessible and a person that is trying to make this town a better place.

Posted by jmo | February 8, 2007 5:41 PM
 

BlouuGHHHHHHH ! ( burp)

Posted by E. Remzen | February 8, 2007 5:43 PM
 

jmo, you are so full of shit

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 5:45 PM
 

DAMMMITTT ED !!!

Those were new shoes !!!

Posted by T . Mattux | February 8, 2007 5:46 PM
 

dear latest a-hole hiding. At least I post under my name. You are a gutless wonder hiding in baristaville.

Posted by jmo | February 8, 2007 6:10 PM
 

dear latest a-hole hiding. At least I post under my name. You are a gutless wonder hiding in baristaville. PS what is the last volunteer work you did in this town

Posted by jmo | February 8, 2007 6:11 PM
 

I agree, jmo is full of shit

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 6:25 PM
 

Listen you cowardly a holes. This is my last post on B net because you idiots are beneath contempt, hiding behind false names. have the guts to reveal your selves, which for some reason you are to chicken to do. I am sick of your cyncisim. I am sick of your negatitity. Do something useful with your pathetic lives. Stand up and be counted. I am Beiruit where people actually have life and death issues. You a holes reside in Baristaville and think snarky thoughts about everything. If you have children have you thought about how negative you are about just about everything. So I say adieu. I wiil not ever post here again because this was supposed to be about dialogue, rather it has turned into name calling. .

Posted by jmo | February 8, 2007 6:39 PM
 

"... have life and death issues"

cause they let terrorist occupy and inhabit their country.

"Listen you cowardly a holes"

And this guy wants you to buy his product?

Posted by hell be back | February 8, 2007 6:44 PM
 

Touchy touchy...and I also always thought you were full of shit...Ed's shit.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 6:52 PM
 

E. Remsen is NOT a very nice person.

Posted by White Sport Coat, Red Carnation | February 8, 2007 6:57 PM
 

This place is replete with examples of:

When the sandbox get crowded (Liberal ideas are challenged) you guys go home cryin'

Well..... sorry kiddies but Lard Ass just arrived. Move over.

Posted by Henny Hendon | February 8, 2007 7:42 PM
 

And this guy wants you to buy his product?


And what product is that?

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 8:11 PM
 

jmo, please don't let the assholes get you down. Consider posting under a screen name yourself so that your stalkers don't keep making it personal.

I post under a screen name precisely because there are wackos that can't stand the marketplace of ideas who, when frenzied, will go out of their way to take personal revenge: cast aspersions to employers, slander in the community, anything other than to allow for civil disagreement.

When you use a handle, you can selectively let people know who you are without having jerks suckerpunch you from behind.

Baristas: how about log ins?

Posted by a regular poster | February 8, 2007 8:12 PM
 

You're saying that someone is really named jmo? Because if not, then he/she is not posting under a real name. So WHAT are you talking about?

Oh, and I have no idea who this jmo is, but based on his whining, i'm tempted to think he's an a-hole. just saying.

Posted by ok, i'm new here. | February 8, 2007 8:21 PM
 

jmo is an a-hole. He once posted saying he'd never be back...he lied.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:13 PM
 

And this guy wants you to buy his product?


And what product is that?

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:19 PM
 

I don't know who jmo is, but I have read many of his/her comments. They were as petty as any of the others on this site.

Jmo seemed to be very loyal to Mr. Remsen. Way beyond logic. He seemed like a little nerdy pit bull for the guy.

I was always surprised when he looked down at others not using full names. What is jmo? Sounds like a handle to me.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 9:30 PM
 

"" These "things" are happening in this town because there is a market for them.

you people don't get it. "_____________________

Oh yes, "we people" do get it !

There's also a market for drugs & prostition.

Because there's a market, shall the masses "Git her done" and look the other way should those "luxuries" increase?

Sell large amounts of land to the underworld, because they would pay blue sky?

See, just because there's a market for something, don't make it right, proper or attractive. You don't want another car dealership to come in where Montclair Ford was, so.... it stays vacant, no commerce & decaying. Thsat's better ?? But, tearing down homes, simply 'cause they are "old" (I know anything Old is no good in today's 35 year old eyes), is okay. Tear down here, over there, down there, back up over there..... it's all okay. Just keep retail establishments vacant, and b'itch about the high taxes.
You really think that monster built at the former Hahnes site is beautiful? Looks like an airport landing tower that fell to earth. It's ugly. Selective Commercial establishments ....


Posted by Say One | February 8, 2007 9:34 PM
 

JMo,
I always found your posts on this blog and on the Montclair yahoogroups to be interesting and informative.

Please don't let this sicko who harasses other posters by posting under hiding and under multiple names drive you off. You're not the first victim of this sort of poster (that dubious honor goes to katie) and, unfortunately, so long as the Barista allows hiding, you won't be the last. The best defense seems to be to ignore him (her?? it). It will eventually loose interest and move on to another target.

It would be a shame to loose one of the regulars who make this blog worth reading.

Posted by Bitpusher | February 8, 2007 10:37 PM
 

Just go to the Barista main page and do a search on JMO. He doesn't try to hide his name He has tons of posts here. I guess he is in Lebanon right now.

I've been posting on this site for a few years now, and first time I've seen him flip. It was getting a bit crass however. But, JMO, you stepped over the crass line too.

I think I would enjoy this site more if people would disagree more civilly.

In this writers opinion, some teardowns are necessary (yet unfortunate). It's when we get into the variances that I'm against the teardowns. If you buy an old house and want to tear it down, go ahead. We just need to make it living hell for them to get a variance to do something like Crisco.

And for the record on our Mayor. I don't care what good thing he may have done. He is the worst mayor that I have ever had (20 years in montclair and 30 elseware).

And, "say one", I agree with your comments on the Hahnes building

 

I did a JMO search and this certainly isn't the 1st time he has gone over the edge. He has a screw loose.

Posted by Anonymous | February 8, 2007 10:56 PM
 

Above hiding post was mine.

And Bitpusher. While I enjoy reading most of the regular posters (JMO included), his comments were just as out of line as the the others.

Posted by ru486 | February 8, 2007 10:58 PM
 

I meant the 10:52 hiding post was mine

Posted by ru486 | February 8, 2007 11:00 PM
 

In response to the 2:11 comment: "For once, arm yourself with FACTS, not BS and idle rants. Take a drive around town and look at the houses the Van Notes have built and tell me if you can find even one that does not enhance tha character of the neighborhood."
We live in one. It looks fine but it's hard to believe it "enhances" the look of the neighborhoood more than the green space it replaced. More significantly, it was built on the cheap -- to turn a quick profit. Less than 10 years after buying a brand new house, we discovered that they didn't even use any kind of tyvec or vapor barrier between the plywood and the siding, and there was major water damage to the foundation. They declined any responsibility...

Posted by don't want to be identified | February 8, 2007 11:33 PM
 

Are you saying it took you almost 10 years to discover deficencies in your house? What responsibility do YOU take for not having a proper inspection? "It was built on the cheap-- to turn a quick profit" which YOU provided. Suck it up.

Posted by ... | February 8, 2007 11:52 PM
 

But, JMO, you stepped over the crass line too.

Yes, he did. But he was provoked. Read the responses to to his initial post. Were they refutations of his arguments? No, they were vile, childish, personal attacks.

Posted by BitPusher | February 8, 2007 11:57 PM
 

Hey jmo, I do know who you are and what you've done for the town, your opinions do carry value with me. If you say Remsen is decent I believe you. I did notice that he personally went out and with help releveled the Watchung bus gazebo. That impressed me. There's only two problems I have which is the absolutely scurrilous way that PAWS is being treated as well as the Plofker shennanigans.

Posted by theproblem | February 9, 2007 12:29 AM
 

Ed Remsen opposes transparency in government. He wants the sunshine laws to go away.

I post under a screen name because people like jmo have attacked me.

jmo, don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.

Glad to see you go.

Posted by Glad to see you go. | February 9, 2007 12:54 AM
 

"Are you saying it took you almost 10 years to discover deficencies in your house? What responsibility do YOU take for not having a proper inspection? "It was built on the cheap-- to turn a quick profit" which YOU provided. Suck it up."

To whoever the Moron is that posted the above... So youre so smart, you would have removed the shingles on your house to check for the vapor barrier? You would stress test the foundation? Obviously you have never paid to have a house inspected and therefore dont own a house. You show your lack of intelligence with this post. Now go home and quit talking about which you have no idea.

Posted by jimmy229oz | February 9, 2007 9:20 AM
 

not really sure what all the fuss is about, it is the south end, you dont think that area needs any TLC? All of you need to mind your own business and worry about issues that effect your life, not others, and to all of you people complaining about wishing you never bought in Montclair, well guess what we never wanted your tight, conservative bleeps here to begin with. One meesage to all of you, stop trying to mess with other peoples finances, you have no right. here is a big fat deeznutts to all of you.

Posted by deeznutts | February 9, 2007 9:41 AM
 

deeznuts, you're comments make no sense. you are clearly nothing more than an instigator who understands very little about this town and it's rich history. why don't you mind your own business, which is obviusly promoting ignorance.

Posted by montclairlover | February 9, 2007 10:30 AM
 

montclairlover, how much time have you spent soaking up the rich history of Montclair around the south end? The only time you've seen this part of the neighborhood is out the window of your car most likely after taking a wrong turn.

Posted by Southie | February 9, 2007 10:43 AM
 

Once again an old house that has not been kept up properly in years was sold after being on the market for almost a year to someone who was going to make some money by tearing it down and building two beautiful homes. Once again not one of you whiney housewives put up and and shut up by purchasing it yourself and restoring it to its 1940's splendor. Why you ask? Because you enjoy messing with other peoples lives because you have nothing better to do. It is pure jealousy that fuels this blog because you are envious of those of us who are getting up everyday and making a difference. Put your money where your mouth is and start purchasing properties and restoring them. In the meantime vote for more unqualified people to sit on the town government who wouldn't know good mangement if it was a huge pothole on Midland avenue. What am I saying!! Of course they would because our tax dollars are spent so well. Anyway, please stop the madness that predicates your cackling. More then likely your kids are getting fat and you have almost killed at least six people this week because you can't see over the steering wheel of your Humvees.

Posted by Chopper | February 9, 2007 10:59 AM
 

Are there any supporters of the teardown out there that want to chime in without being randomly insulting and rude to as many folks as possible? I think the Van Notes would actually appreciate that kind of support and not the venom being spewed above.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 9, 2007 11:11 AM
 

JMO has got to go...bye, bye

Posted by Anonymous | February 9, 2007 11:26 AM
 

It‘s mind boggling that Orange Road in the Fourth Ward’s South End is not yet protected as a historic district. It is one of the oldest streets in Essex County and was the most prominent residential street in town before Upper Mountain Avenue. The teardown was the southern most anchor property of this historic tract. The northern most anchor is Martin’s Funeral Home, once the Pratt House, the home of the person who invented the name “Montclair”. Then there was the Parsons House, (the illustrator & Director of Harpers Weekly, I have a great 1869 image if someone would be so kind as to explain how to link it). Then there is the Darden House and adjacent up-scale African American owned properties from the early 1900’s.

Posted by FGG | February 9, 2007 11:26 AM
 

Hey Fourth Ward - Sandra Lang was/is still asleep at the wheel.

Posted by Anonymous | February 9, 2007 11:32 AM
 

The Darden House, a small estate, is found adjacent to Carey's Woods where Orange Road is crossed by a brook. Historically, the Darden property traces back to land included in Llewellyn Haskell's estate that he had brought from the Baldwin family in the 1840's. Later in the 1850's when Haskell moved up to Eagle Rock, the property passed to the Bull, Warren and Carey Families. Around 1918, Marcus Rothschild built the house on land once a portion of Carey's Woods. Across street were the Craftsman style homes of the Cassio, the Lynch, and the Thompson families. Characteristically, in the Fourth Ward there were also Italo American neighbors like the DiGeronimo, Miele and Miscia families whose homes and family businesses were down the street in the South End Center. Dr. Walter Darden and his wife Mamie Jean acquired their property from the Rothschild family in 1946. The Darden Family had originally been from Wilson, North Carolina and there is a J.W. Darden Foundation www.jwdarden.org in Opelika, Alabama, honoring Dr. Darden's brother, the first African- American Physician in eastern Alabama. The Darden Sisters, Norma Jean and Carole, currently living in Manhattan, have immortalized their home and family history in a 1978 "Spoonbread and Strawberry Wine". This book intends to be a historical family cookbook but is even of greater value as it presents a view of an exceptional social history. Norma Jean Darden who has two restaurants in Harlem, "Miss Mamie's" at 366 W.110th St., named after her mother and "Miss Maude's" at 547 Lenox Ave,
The Darden House, not only hosted an important chapter in local history but more so, African American History. Dr. Darden was one of the first African Americans to be a guest in the audience at the still segregated Cotton Club of Harlem. Among his patients, friends and houseguests were Sarah Vaughn (who rests in nearby Rosedale Cemetery), Billy Eckstein and the Duke Ellington Band as well as Sammy Davis Jr. From the Sports world, Larry Doby, Jackie Robbinson, Monte Irvine and the Newark Eagles baseball team would meet frequently at the Darden House. The house was a favorite place for poet and author of the "Chinaberry Tree", Jessie Faucet Harris who also aided the Dardens and Harold Schott in fundraising and organizing of the NAACP. Among the guest/residents was the great pioneer in American Education, Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune.

Posted by FGG | February 9, 2007 11:33 AM
 

Nope, no history there ;/

Thanks Frank, always love your posts!

Posted by State Street Pete | February 9, 2007 11:37 AM
 

Thank you State Street Pete. I appreciate your interest and your solidarity!

Posted by FGG | February 9, 2007 11:44 AM
 

FGG you are obviously a librarian, may I ask how long you have lived in the clair, I for one have been here for 33 years, you got that beat?

Posted by deeznutts | February 9, 2007 11:50 AM
 

I know you all are sick of me saying it but, FGG for Mayor!

Posted by Kay | February 9, 2007 12:01 PM
 

it is clear that deeznuts and this chopper person are merely a couple of hooligans looking to pass the time at thier mindless jobs. these two are probably old school chums who spend their free time soaking up montclair's history at the local watering holes, rather than doing anything productive. this is a serious issue for serious people...why don't you chumps go take a lunch break.

Posted by montclairlover | February 9, 2007 12:17 PM
 

I encourage deeznuts and chopper to keep posting. It provides great insight into the mindset of those who view Montclair only in terms of square feet utilized versus dollars invested.

Posted by appletony | February 9, 2007 12:25 PM
 

Dear Deeznuts: I was born in the Fourth Ward at St. Vincents 48 years ago and have also lived in Rutherford, Spring Lake, NYC and Italy. I conserve a local history collection that I wish to share with the community. - Frank

Posted by FGG | February 9, 2007 12:44 PM
 

"See, just because there's a market for something, don't make it right, proper or attractive"


Maybe not,


BUT IT DOES GUARANTY THAT IT WILL SELL.

Posted by A Monster Next Door | February 9, 2007 1:12 PM
 

To "don't want to be identified"

I don't know who was involved 10 years ago...but I bought a house that was renovated by Van Note Renovations with in the last couple years and WE LOVE IT...we could not be happier. If I ever have a question Ryan always returns my phone calls.

** and I am pretty sure that Ryan was still in college 10 years ago, not renovating houses**

Posted by Happy | February 9, 2007 1:57 PM
 

I would like to know how long the house was on the market and if Van Notes did not buy it, who was going to? Who was planning on rebuilding this historic site and bringing out its history for all to know? Before it was demolished, no one was going to do anything with it and now because someone decided to make it useful everyone with an opinion is coming out. Where were all of you when the house was on the market? What initiatives have you started to stop this scourge?

Posted by Curious | February 9, 2007 2:38 PM
 

"What initiatives have you started to stop this scourge?" - Well, I've posted here a lot, and I've rabble-roused. Yup, definitely roused a lot of rabble.

Oh yeah, and I pay taxes. That’s usually the answer people give here when having to justify speaking out about things that effect their town and quality of life. I guess I should know better.

Posted by State Street Pete | February 9, 2007 2:58 PM
 

"When the sandbox get crowded (Liberal ideas are challenged) you guys go home cryin'"

Guess someone who stormed out of the sandbox w/ shovel and pail gave someone an earful yesterday. BCP

Kinda makes you wonder who is being "threa(d)tend here.

There have been rumors of poster reprisals however they are still unconfirmed....

Posted by Big Brother | February 9, 2007 3:42 PM
 

Your town, as you have know it, is over. We will assimilate you old homes and they will become part of the collective. You will earn to live in overpriced, overvalued dwellings, and neigborhoods as safe as those in the largest urban areas. Soon, you will adjust to the fact that no one will want to buy your house, and you will be stuck in it...FOREVER!

From this day forward, you will get your hood on. Ahh, ha,, ha, ha, ha,!

----Locutus of Brick City

Posted by Anonymous | February 9, 2007 3:55 PM
 

Your town, as you have know it, is over. We will assimilate you old homes and they will become part of the collective. You will earn to live in overpriced, overvalued dwellings, and neigborhoods as safe as those in the largest urban areas. Soon, you will adjust to the fact that no one will want to buy your house, and you will be stuck in it...FOREVER!

From this day forward, you will get your hood on. Ahh, ha,, ha, ha, ha,!

----Locutus of Brick City

Posted by Locutus |