« Obama, McCain Sweep Potomac Primaries | Main | Tragedy At The YMCA »


Brookdale Dog Park Has Neighbors Growling

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Montclair resident Tony LeQuire-Schott lives on Chester Road, within barking distance of Brookdale Park's new doggy playland - barking and parking are just some of the neighborhood complaints she's trying to resolve with County Exec Joey D...From The Star Ledger:

"I love my animals. This is not about animals," she said. "We cannot handle the noise."

So yesterday, after circulating petitions, LeQuire-Schott sat with neighbors in her living room for a face-to-face with Essex County Executive Joseph DiVincenzo Jr.

DiVincenzo agreed to move the fence and push back what is now the run for larger dogs some 50 feet farther away from the houses and erect a buffer of large pine trees to visually shield the park and muffle the barking.

Dogs and their owners will have new rules to follow:

Starting Monday, there are new visiting hours: 8 - 6 (Nov. 1 - March 31) , 8am - 8pm April 1 through Oct. 31. Gates to the fenced-in runs will be locked after hours.

Directional signs to "Dog Park Parking" will be erected on Montclair's Grove Street to steer dog owners toward the park entrance and away from Chester and Mt. Vernon roads, which dead-end at the park and have become magnets for dog owners seeking a close spot nearby

DiVincenzo plans to flip the locations of the small and large dog runs, and enlarge the small-dog's current area run farther into the park, away from the homes.


Posted by Annette Batson on February 13, 2008 10:13 AM
Email this story |
 

I feel for the folks that are facing a summer of barking.

Personally, I like the sound of barking dogs but I know that not everyone can handle it.

My neighbor has some doggies that bark quite a bit and I can tune it out. Plus their my buds and I'm their cookie supplier.

I hope the pine trees help. They should do a dense packet of arborvitae. That might work.

Posted by MellonBrush | February 13, 2008 11:32 AM
 

The only thing that will work are those big, beautiful highway sound barricades.

Seriously though, was noise even a part of the discussion of where to put the park?

No.

They put it where the unofficial dog park already stood.

Dumb.

And what about the cars/traffic on those streets that dead end into the park?

Didn't think about that either, huh?

(Well at least they have the water fountains.)

Posted by profwilliams | February 13, 2008 11:35 AM
 

Maybe they should turn those water fountains into waterfalls to create some lovely white noise of gushing water.

Posted by Liz | February 13, 2008 11:49 AM
 

What noise???!!! I'm there nearly every day and I frankly do not feel the noise is excessive. Screaming maggots . . . now that's noise pollution!

Posted by rchanin | February 13, 2008 11:54 AM
 

Prof,

I think those streets that dead end into the park always had significant use by park going folks - especially dog lovers. As you pointed out, this part of Brookdale Park has always been a tradional place to let dogs off the leash.

Posted by MellonBrush | February 13, 2008 12:01 PM
 

Ask the woman who complained if she would like to sell her house to me. I'm in the market and would love that location.

Posted by dlowen16 | February 13, 2008 12:05 PM
 

nice of Joe D to make some changes but these upset neighbors will never be satisfied. The change in hours are meaningless. Very few people come to the dog park after dark and officially the park is closed so the police can eject anyone. As has been pointed out dogs and their owners have been congregating at the same spot for years before the dog park existed although not on the scale that now exists. If you build it, they will come. The locals who know about the access from Chester will continue to use it.

Posted by ItsNotLifeAsWeKnowIt | February 13, 2008 12:30 PM
 

The prof (my some miracle of randomness, no doubt--there couldn't possibly be any other explanation) is right. The problem here is that the dog park is successful--people and their dogs are using it. Who'd 'a thunk?

Posted by walleroo | February 13, 2008 12:32 PM
 

Mellon,

But the traffic now does not compare to that in the past.


Posted by profwilliams | February 13, 2008 12:35 PM
 

I'm wondering how the success of the Brookdale dog run will affect the "unofficial" dog run at Mills Reservation. We've actually stopped going to Mills altogether due to the fact that so many dog owners bring their dogs and let them run around unleashed. One time, a couple of large dogs running far ahead of their owner actually jumped up on my toddler, knocking him over. The dog owner's response: get over it.

Posted by complainerpuss | February 13, 2008 1:01 PM
 

We need doggy police! They'll have little uniforms and pensions. Imagine a St. Bernard in a uniform flashing his badge and licking evildoers into submission. Take a bit outta crime, indeed!

Posted by Spot The Looney | February 13, 2008 1:07 PM
 

some people just need to grouse. this time it's barking dogs in a public park causing unrest, next time it will be the sound of laughing children causing complaints!

Posted by not a jersey girl | February 13, 2008 1:21 PM
 

If you knew how much of the day they spend sleeping, you wouldn't be nominating them for police work. Although if there's the opportunity for a pension... Best we could do is to catch some evildoer in a web of drool.

Posted by ackme | February 13, 2008 3:55 PM
 

"some people just need to grouse."

That's it. Maybe we should import some grouse into the park so they can grouse about the grouse.

Posted by Miss Martta | February 13, 2008 4:03 PM
 

"this time it's barking dogs in a public park causing unrest, next time it will be the sound of laughing children causing complaints!"

Wow....talking about a reach

I really don't think the laughing children complaint process would go too far. And last I checked, children were still considered people. Not really a valid comparison.

I don't blame the home owners near the dog park complaining. I wouldn't want to listen to a barking dog all day. And what about all of the crap all over the place caused by the 50% of the dog owners that feel that it's their birthright to allow their dog to crap anywhere they want and NOT clean it up.

That dog park was a stupid idea. Now when I jog in the park, I need to run by a gauntlet of dogs barking while displaying their teeth at me.

Posted by Hari.Seldon | February 13, 2008 5:25 PM
 

A big Huh? to the last post? There was always a "dog park" at that same exact location. When I used to go about 12 years ago it had ballooned up to about 40 dogs on the weekends from about 9am to noon.

Now there are dogs, again, in the exact same place, but in an enclosure.

Back then, there was no garbage can, now there is.

So, let's see, dogs in the same place, people still parking on the dead end streets adjacent to the park, garbage cans now so possibly less poop on the ground, similar level of noise unless dogs have been getting louder in the last few years.

And running a gauntlet...how could this be worse than when the area was not fenced in?

Posted by Jon Doh | February 13, 2008 5:32 PM
 

Maybe Ol' Hari's gotten slower in his old age.

Posted by MISTALUKE | February 13, 2008 6:38 PM
 

I have heard that neighbors will complain about the tennis courts next.

Tennis players are parking on the dead ends streets near the courts and the constant grunting and noise of rackets connecting with balls is driving the neighbors crazy.

After all, it is *their* park and not the publics!

Posted by HidingInBaristaville | February 14, 2008 6:26 AM
 

"There was always a "dog park" at that same exact location"

I've lived in Montclair near the park for 20 years. There might have been some trees that were used by dogs running around and maybe even Essex County might have called it a dog park but there was never anywhere near the number of dogs currently using the park.

If it was a dog park before the recent re-construction it was the best camouflaged and most underutilized dog park in the history of dog parks.

Posted by Hari.Seldon | February 14, 2008 8:08 AM
 

Sort of reminds me of the folks complaining a few years ago, after buying a severely discounted house abutting the train tracks, about how loud the trains are and how they actually use a whistle when approaching a station. Shocking indeed. A train on the train tracks.

Posted by mets2008 | February 14, 2008 8:51 AM
 

except, of course, prior to their purchase, the dog park didn't exist. Oh and prior to their home purchase the running of exciting un-leashed dogs in the park was illegal. But other than that, the situations are identical.

Posted by ROC | February 14, 2008 8:55 AM
 

I've been walking through that area of the park to barking dogs for 22+ years last time I checked.

Posted by mets2008 | February 14, 2008 9:00 AM
 

How nice!

Posted by ROC | February 14, 2008 9:03 AM
 

But, you're absolutely right, that fancy new fence makes a ton of noise.

Posted by mets2008 | February 14, 2008 9:06 AM
 

Sorry ROC and Hari, but you're wrong. I've been going for almost 13 years, the age of my dog, and it was always there...in the exact same location. It was a smaller group during the week, but mushroomed on the weekends. It may never have had the total number of dogs that visit now, but it was always about 40 dogs or so at the same time on the weekend mornings.

At least now it seems more contained and cleaner.

Did the same neighbors complain when it was an "informal" dog park? Did they complain when the county put forth the proposal?

Face it, you bought a house next to a public park. Some negatives, as well as positives go along with this. I bought a house across from a school. Should I start complaining that cars park on the street during school hours?

Posted by Jon Doh | February 14, 2008 9:06 AM
 

Seems to me that before the dog park, people complained that there were too many dogs running loose in the park. Now that they have a contained dog park, they're complaining about the barking. News flash: Dogs bark! If this is the worse thing to happen in your lives, consider yourself lucky. I, for one, would much rather hear dogs bark than motorcycle engines (sorry, Cathar!), garnage trucks or ambulance "sireens," as my aunt in Texas calls them.

Posted by Miss Martta | February 14, 2008 9:07 AM
 

My suggestion, Miss Martta, would be to have cats instead. Purring (which is what properly tuned and mufflered bike engines do) is so much more soothing than barking.

Posted by cathar | February 14, 2008 9:17 AM
 

Cathar, you know as well as I do that no self-respecting cat would subject him or herself to a "cat park."

Posted by Miss Martta | February 14, 2008 9:21 AM
 

In Malta, Miss Martta, the climate is warmish the year-round and the locals consider it good luck to feed strays. So cat colonies abound, so successfully that the Anglican Church in the capital of Valletta has a sign, with a picture of a cat on it, saying "Please don't let me inside during services." The entire country seems a "cat park" sometimes.

But during all the 10 days I spent there, I never once saw the doggie breed called "Maltese." (There is, however, a guy who surfcasts in Sea Bright who always has three of them with him.)

Posted by cathar | February 14, 2008 9:32 AM
 

Awww, how cute! It's funny, sometimes the name of the breed has nothing to do with its country of origin. Labradors, for example, actually come from Newfoundland, not Labrador.

Posted by Miss Martta | February 14, 2008 9:42 AM
 

One of my cats, Tiger, is purring impaired. For some reason he can't produce a sustained purr. He tends to grunt when I give him attention.

He does a great Ray Charles imitation when I scratch the root of his tail. He swings his head from side to side and closes his eyes. I'm thinking about putting some video on youtube when my job gets eliminated and I have more free time.

Posted by MellonBrush | February 14, 2008 9:53 AM
 

MellonBrush, like this video?

Posted by Spot The Looney | February 14, 2008 11:49 AM
 

STL,

Yes! Orange Tabbies are the best!

I have another cat that can say 'water'. Well, it sounds like water. He makes a big fuss whenever I put a fresh water bowl down. Very funny.

Thanks for the link. The music was very funny too.

:)

Posted by MellonBrush | February 14, 2008 12:11 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 9:59 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 9:59 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:00 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:00 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:00 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:00 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:00 PM
 

For the sake of accuracy, several of those complaining about the noise have lived on the streets involved for 30 or more years. There have been no train tracks or dog parks nearby during that period.
As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.
Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!

Posted by n. schott | February 14, 2008 10:02 PM
 

{{{{Miss Martta raises hand}}}}

Posted by Miss Martta | February 14, 2008 11:29 PM
 

For the sake of everyone else, n.schott should learn to only hit the "post" button once. His/her words are simply not so important as to warrant multiple postings.

Posted by cathar | February 14, 2008 11:44 PM
 

I really feel for the folks living close to the dog park. I used to go to the "informal" park when I first moved out of the city...13 years ago. Not wanting to get the summons that was always threatened, and becoming a stay-at-home-mom changed my need for such a park. We installed a fence in our back yard. Now, my children are older, I have a new puppy, and we have enjoyed the legal socialization of the dogs. What a GREAT park! I was truly happy to see it come together.

To tell the truth, I never gave any consideration to the neighbors, and what they must be hearing, or dealing with. Having people cut through your yard only antagonizes your own dog's barking, which can disturb your own day-to-day life, which I feel has to be respected while in the sanctity of your own home. I never used the cut through, but drove to the park, but maybe now that people know what a problem this is, they could change their ways? Maybe?

That said, no matter what the hour, incessant barking (you know the kind, and it is different from other types of barks) is a nasty nuisance. In part, it is a symptom of an owner who has not properly conditioned their dog to behave properly. And this is evident in an owner IGNORING the barking, or being so frustrated as to say "I don't know what to do about the barking," or my favorite, "he won't listen to me." Yelling at a dog to be quiet, is silly, when a stern "sshh" a corrective pull on their choke leash, topped off with a firm stare in the eye should get their attention. Crying babies aren't welcome in a movie theatre, and incessant barking shouldn't ruin a wonderful park experience for the rest of us responsible adults.

I truly wish, that instead of making such a hasty decision to rework this park, and reallocate a TREMENDOUS amount of money to "redo" and "reduce" this park, the county would have held an open forum for a joint solution. Perhaps we could have come up with some guidelines to be posted at the park, just as there are guidelines posted at swimming pools and gyms. The users could police each other, esp. when it came to excessive barking. Perhaps, once aware of the annoyances and abuses suffered by home owners the dog park users would have had an opportunity to change their ways.

The users couldn't do anything about the portable toilet, so to me, covering or sheilding that view is well worth the $$,

Now that decisions have been made, I think it's important to voice my MAIN objection. The time factor. To have this park closed in the early morning between the hours of 6a.m. and 8 a.m. is unreasonable. Any dog owner, who actually works in Manhattan, or commutes to any other place, is going to be sorely dissappointed. Having a well exercised pup/dog before the day begins is the only sure way to maintain a low level of anxiety for both the dog and the owner. Knowing your dog is exercised enough to prevent her or him from chewing bits of furniture really can give both dog and owner, peace of mind. As a stay-at-home-mom and dog walker, I have no need for this park between 6 and 8 am. But it really isn't fair to have a dog park closed until 8.a.m.

As far as the money, I could definitely see that money put to better use planting trees around the dog run, or having a community garden in Brookdale Park. There are lots of folks (in nearby apartments) who would love a little plot of land to plant their own victory garden. Better yet, make it a cooperative experiment in organic gardening, with a community compost center.

Posted by Katboy | February 15, 2008 12:59 AM
 

"As for the 'informal' dog park, it involved significantly fewer animals, significantly shorter hours of 'operation' and it was located closer to the interior of the park and encompassed a small fraction of the space covered by the recently constructed park.

The informal dog park was in the exact same space as the new dog park and covered the exact same amount of space. I had been going for 12 years. Someone earlier had mentioned the informal park had been there for about 22 years. The hours of operation were much shorter, but there wewre a good 40 dogs at a time for a concentrated period of time on the weekends.

"Also, I can't help but note that none of those who indicate no problem with listening to constant dog barking offered to have the dog park located in their back yards!!"

I didn't buy a house with a public park in my back yard. I bought a house across froma school, so I "offered" to have cars lined up on my street every morning and afternoon. Is it too late to complain?

Posted by Jon Doh | February 15, 2008 7:05 AM
 

It seems rather pointless to have a dog park open only from 8 -6, the time most people are either at work or on their way to or from their jobs. And siwtching the large/small areas is really silly. Small dogs bark too, some can be as loud as a larger dog. I guess the county has money to waste.

Posted by jerseygurl | February 15, 2008 7:17 AM
 

It seems rather pointless to have a dog park open only from 8 -6, the time most people are either at work or on their way to or from their jobs. And siwtching the large/small areas is really silly. Small dogs bark too, some can be as loud as a larger dog. I guess the county has money to waste.

Posted by jerseygurl | February 15, 2008 7:18 AM
 

Joe D. works fast.

Signs are going up on Grove St. right now.

Posted by profwilliams | February 15, 2008 9:25 AM
 

Whenever I've visited the dog park in South Orange, I find it's usually the small breeds that bark more and louder than the large breeds.

Posted by Miss Martta | February 15, 2008 9:30 AM
 

But what of the HALF BREED.?

Posted by profwilliams | February 15, 2008 9:48 AM
 

How about making the park available only for Basenjis?

Posted by croiagusanam | February 15, 2008 9:52 AM
 

If noise is a concern, use of the park should be limited to HEDGEHOGS


/(yeah, I was just looking for an excuse to post it)

Posted by appletony | February 15, 2008 9:56 AM
 

apple,

Folks would complain about the spend carrots all around....

Posted by profwilliams | February 15, 2008 10:02 AM
 

LOL, Prof. I LOVE Cher...what's she been up to?

Posted by Miss Martta | February 15, 2008 10:03 AM
 

appletony, CUTE OVERLOAD! Hedges rule!

Posted by Spot The Looney | February 15, 2008 10:10 AM
 

I get a real kick out of posters referring to the area that preceded the new dog run as the "informal dog park." I think "illegal dog park" would be more accurate. What I find so sad is that after so many years of dog owners letting their dogs run loose (illegally, may I again mention) at that location, they've somehow managed to completely ruin what once was a very nice area of the park, and at the same time managed to have their own bad behavoir awarded by having the county give them their very own dog park.

Posted by complainerpuss | February 15, 2008 10:06 PM
 
You must log into Vbulletin to post Comments. Log in below.

Not Registered? Click Here to register.

Joe Bartoni's








Weather
Movies
TV

Gmail
NJ Transit
DeCamp
People Search
Google Maps
Dictionary
Google News
Homeland Security
Essex County News
High School Sports
» MONTCLAIR LINKS
ABOUT
Official Montclair Website
Montclair Center
Montclair Schools
Montclair Community Pre-K
Montclair State University
American Towns
Town Profile
THE ARTS
Arts Montclair
Montclair Art Museum
Montclair Arts Council
Peak Performances
ATTRACTIONS
New Jersey Jackals
Presby Iris Gardens
Van Vleck Gardens
COMMUNITY
Montclair Adult School
Montclair Public Library
Montclair YMCA
Mountainside Health Foundation
Red Cross
Toni's Kitchen
COMMUTING
The Clever Commute
Montclair-Boonton Line Train Schedule
FORUMS/BLOGS
Montclair Journal
Montclair Watercooler
Montclair Unmoderated
NJ.com Montclair Forum
ORGANIZATIONS
Bike Montclair
Friends of Anderson Park
League of Women Voters of the Montclair Area
MEWS
Montclair Engineers
MFEE/Montclair Reads
Montclair Fund for Women
Montclair Historical Society
Montclair PTA
Montclair Wildlife
Outpost in the Burbs
OTHER
New Jersey Life and Leisure
VillageRadio

» GLEN RIDGE LINKS
» BLOOMFIELD LINKS
» OUTER BARISTAVILLE
» OF INTEREST BLOGS
BARISTAS
Read Me, Love Me, Buy the Book
stopkatie.com
ARTISTS

Artisan Studio Underground
Artist / Blacksmith Charlie Spademan
Dust and Rust
habit-image-reaction
I Will Kick Your Ass For World Peace
CULTURE
La Tertulia
FOOD
Cat Food
Chowhound
Hungry Chef
Mano a Vino
Table Hopping with Rosie
FORUMS
E-gullet NJ
Springsteen Forum
GARDENING
The Gardeners Apprentice
The Gardening Guru
GO GREEN
Reuse and Recycle in Montclair
HEALTH
Medicana
NEW JERSEY
Bada Bing Blog
Blog Net News NJ
Jersey Side
NJ.com
NJHotShots
NJ My Way
Weird NJ
OF USE
Craig's List NJ
PetFinder
Urban Dictionary
PARENTING
Dante's Inferno with Children
FinSlippy
Looky Daddy
The Mamahood
Raisinology
Who's the Grown Up?
PERSONAL
55 Secret Street
Anovelista
CarreFemme
The Daily Doormatt
Detox Moxie
Inclusive Ceremonies
Martta's World
Maui Girl's Meanderings
The Media Drop
Meg McGonagall
MOM & Pop Culture
My Life as a Rabid Blog
Tina Bell
Snake Oil Sam
The Society for Conscious Craft
Yenta Diva
POLITICAL
The Green Line
Gold Finch Tech
New Jersey Politics Unusual
REAL ESTATE
Crystal Ball Real Estate
Eco Realty
TECHNOLOGY
We Give Good Tech

Email us to link your blog