Alvarez Says Measures Being Taken After MHS Incidents

Wednesday, Nov 25, 2009 9:00am  |  COMMENTS (21)

Montclair Schools Superintendent Frank Alvarez wrote to district parents late on Monday about the incidents last week at Montclair High School, which involved MHS and other students, and resulted in many arrests.

Dear Parents, Guardians, and Caregivers:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of recent incidents at Montclair High School. Although you may not have a child at the high school, it is important that you understand that these matters are of serious concern to the district and that appropriate measures are being taken.


Last week there were two major altercations involving several Montclair High School students as well as non-resident students. As a result, eight Montclair High School students and four non-resident students were arrested by the Montclair Police Department. All Montclair High School students who were involved in the altercations have been identified and suspended. Further disposition of the matter relative to either expulsion or alternative placement will be forthcoming pending due process proceedings pursuant to Montclair Board of Education policy.
Student safety is always a top priority. A safe and orderly environment is foremost in establishing a productive learning community. Please be assured that we are doing everything possible to achieve this goal.
Sincerely,
Frank Alvarez
Superintendent

Related Posts:

21 Comments

  1. POSTED BY jerseygurl  |  November 25, 2009 @ 9:34 am

    Measures? Oh brother.

  2. POSTED BY Right of Center™  |  November 25, 2009 @ 9:38 am

    measures have been taken.
    passive voice has been engaged.

  3. POSTED BY Mrs. Martta123  |  November 25, 2009 @ 9:41 am

    Ugh…reads like a form letter that you get from your bank or insurance company.
    Do you mind explaining what “measures” have been taken?

  4. POSTED BY oliver  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:04 am

    Not that hard to understand, is it? It’s pretty clear to me that the “measures” include immediate suspension; now they’re deciding whether to expel them or send them out of district. And there have been plenty of cops around after school lately…

  5. POSTED BY walleroo  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:11 am

    Where was Alvarez last week? On the golf course? Hiding under his desk? What a leader.

  6. POSTED BY Right of Center™  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:13 am

    Mai Tai’s were had.

  7. POSTED BY TraitorJo  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:19 am

    “measures being taken” …. let’s try “I resign”

  8. POSTED BY Kay  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:32 am

    Or, “There will be resignations”

  9. POSTED BY MoreTaxes Please  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:38 am

    He is not worried, his kids don’t go to the HS

  10. POSTED BY walleroo  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:38 am

    That is ridiculous, Jo. Alvarez would never say “I resign.” It’s too simple, too definitive, too unambiguous.
    The best we can hope for is something like this:
    “In the interests of facilitating efficient management of the school district, it may in the future be prudent to make certain changes to the structure of the management team. A study has been commissioned and outside consultants will be retained. Upon receipt of their recommendations, in six to nine months, meetings will be undertaken to determine the correct course of action, and a final recommendation submitted to the town for actioning.”

  11. POSTED BY Right of Center™  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:42 am

    Sounds like Cary Africk saying “no”.

  12. POSTED BY Opinionated  |  November 25, 2009 @ 10:58 am

    “All Montclair High School students who were involved in the altercations have been… suspended.” Those fighting in the streets? We are keeping them out in the streets.

  13. POSTED BY profwilliams  |  November 25, 2009 @ 11:03 am

    Thank God the Pony Express finally delivered his letter.
    I mean, it’s not like we have a system that 1) can immediately put this letter in a place everyone can see, or 2) can immediately send this letter to EVERY resident/student.
    This guy is a joke and he has to go.
    Between this letter and Earle’s letter, well you know how I feel about these two idiots….
    (Any chance that Rhodes Scholar kid can take his place?)

  14. POSTED BY Shannon  |  November 25, 2009 @ 11:21 am

    The more press these highschool fights get, the more fights there are going to be.
    Plus, what highschool doesn’t have their share of fist-fights? This isn’t news.

  15. POSTED BY Mrs. Martta123  |  November 25, 2009 @ 11:27 am

    It’s news, Shannon, because the fight occurred between students and out-of-towners who were not students. Also, one of the students assaulted a police officer.

  16. POSTED BY Nellie  |  November 25, 2009 @ 11:42 am

    The bigger issue here is why are these young people so angry?

  17. POSTED BY profwilliams  |  November 25, 2009 @ 11:54 am

    Shannon,
    Kids don’t watch/listen to “the PRESS” anymore.
    They hear about it in the best place possible: SCHOOL.
    So unlike a communities feeling about crime, which is skewed by media accounts, fights at schools don’t.
    Because I doubt very many kids were following up here or on Montclairtimes.com when they could simply go on facebook and hear from someone who “was there.”
    And Nellie, kids have always fought– some as great art– The Outsiders, West Side Stories, etc. so the question is not why are THESE young people angry.
    It’s why don’t they dance in unison, snapping their fingers and singing!!

  18. POSTED BY walleroo  |  November 26, 2009 @ 11:28 am

    kids have always fought– some as great art…
    This is silly, prof. Kids may fight, but they don’t always strike policemen and refuse to disburse when asked. This statement says more about your unwillingness to think about the problems in this district than any fundamental truth about kids. The recent violence shows that something is rotten in Montclair. You just don’t want to see it.

  19. POSTED BY all about our students  |  November 27, 2009 @ 11:06 am

    if it is true that “measures are being taken” can someone please explain why [portion of comment deleted] was in school on Tues? Why did the school allow these athletes back to school so quickly? Are they more concerned with their sports record then the safety of our students? What do you have to say about that Dr. Alvarez/Mr.Porcelli/Mr. Earle???

  20. POSTED BY profwilliams  |  November 27, 2009 @ 11:22 am

    Mr. Roo,
    Certainly you jest with this idea that only NOW there is violence in our schools?
    As I wrote, there has been fights and will be fights in the future. Some will involve cops, crossing guards, teachers, lunch aids– you name it.
    And YES, kids have refused to “disburse when asked,” before.
    This IS NOT NEW.
    Your suggestion that it is tells me much about you.
    By your rule, because Montclair produced a Rhodes Scholar, that would mean something is RIGHT with our schools. (I guess YOU just don’t want to see it….)
    Can’t have it only work one way.
    Unless, of course, you’re working hard to make a false point.

  21. POSTED BY primoose  |  January 23, 2010 @ 3:43 am

    Involving the police in this matter in any way, shape, or form is a mistake. Also, I find it extremely distressing at how people think roughing up a police officer is any worse than doing it to a classmate or someone not in a uniform. Quite frankly, a lot of officers (especially in the Montclair Police Department) could use some of that. Pardon me if I’ve offended anyone.

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to comments@baristanet.com. For trouble with registration or commenting, write to comments@baristanet.com.

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

I would love to see Santorum get the nod. Maybe then the politically comatose members of society will wake up.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

Baristanet on Flickr