NJ Imposes Higher Fines For Drivers & Pedestrians

Wednesday, Mar 31, 2010 1:00pm  |  COMMENTS (10)

Starting tomorrow, April 1, NJ drivers who don’t come to a full stop for pedestrians in crosswalks will be subject to fines of $200; pedestrians caught jaywalking will get slapped with a $54 fine.
Do you think the fine will make the streets of Baristaville safer for pedestrians?

Related Posts:

10 Comments

  1. POSTED BY Nick Danger  |  March 31, 2010 @ 1:27 pm

    In the spirit of staying on the sunny side of our big brother government I put forward the following:
    http://www.nj.gov/oag/hts/pedestrian.html

  2. POSTED BY RaeVen  |  March 31, 2010 @ 1:40 pm

    I certainly would have liked to impose a citizens’ fine on the dimwit brunette who came an inch from hitting me with her blue minivan on Watchung today.

  3. POSTED BY Caphilly  |  March 31, 2010 @ 1:44 pm

    They continue to pass these laws (which is great) but there’s little enforcement beyond, say, the first month or two. These laws are very necessary. That said, what about the “no talking on cell phones while driving” law? Remember that? The police tried enforcing that for about 2 months and then . . .
    Unfortunately, these laws will deter no one unless they’re enforced. It’s sad that people need to be forced to do the right thing. But it seems as tho that’s just life (or human nature).

  4. POSTED BY Mrs._Martta333  |  March 31, 2010 @ 1:46 pm

    I’m still going to look both ways. I don’t trust NJ drivers.

  5. POSTED BY cncrnd  |  March 31, 2010 @ 1:55 pm

    Another revenue scheme. I’m all for stopping for pedestrians in crosswalks, but lets use some common sense. On Grove St. this morning there wasn’t a car within a couple of hundred yards behind me when a woman and her dog stepped right in front of my car. They ought to have a field day issuing jaywalking tickets on Valley Rd. in Upper Montclair also. This will be tough for the NYC transplants to get used to.

  6. POSTED BY bebopgun  |  March 31, 2010 @ 2:16 pm

    i think it’s time citizens of our great state began fining politicians for passing ridiculous laws that do nothing. For each ineffectual law or fine, a politician must pay $200 to his/her local library.

  7. POSTED BY lavillas  |  March 31, 2010 @ 4:12 pm

    We could balance our budgets if we just enforce the laws we have. What are our politicians afraid of? Bailing their friends or relatives out of jail and getting caught trying to fix a ticket? Tell the cops to start enforcing the laws, especially seat belt and cell phone laws.

  8. POSTED BY Right of Center™  |  March 31, 2010 @ 4:16 pm

    “We could balance our budgets if we just enforce the laws we have”
    I’d like to see that spreadsheet. There is no possible way that it is true. I’m all for law enforcement, but it’s not a financial windfall. In fact, I’d bet all the possible fines we could conceivably collect would not even pay for the legal system.
    (which is as it should be, we don’t levy fines to make money).

  9. POSTED BY Kay  |  March 31, 2010 @ 4:17 pm

    HAR DE HAR HAR!!!
    Like that toothless cell phone law?
    Like the ‘no parking’ signs that are constantly disregarded?
    Like the tailgating violation that is supposed to result in a 2-point ticket?
    Like the “full and complete stop at a stop sign” rule?
    Like “no right turn on red from the center lane”?
    Like people who turn left directly beneath a sign that says “no left turn” simply because Jill the GPS Lady says to?
    Like the “look both ways before crossing the street” rule? (I notice this is frequently disregarded near train stations, especially by people wearing headphones. Maybe they think that the iPod confers a Cone of Protection.)
    hahahahaha I am laughing so hard I’m crying!
    While I am not in support of a nanny state, I sincerely believe that people will continue to be jerks around here until there is some pain. Which probably would amount to traffic cameras.
    Plus they will need to spend at least a bazillion dollars on a marketing campaign (tv, full page print ads, etc.) to explain the Jaywalking rule. Apparently here it has nothing to do with whether you cross at a corner or not.
    But you all have heard this from me before.

  10. POSTED BY Hmmm  |  March 31, 2010 @ 4:37 pm

    I’m all for stopping for pedestrians who follow the law as well. Too many times people just turn right into a crosswalk from the sidewalk with no warning that they were going to cross the street. Cars need time to stop. I’ve had people shoot me dirty looks as if I was supposed to read their minds and stop long before they were ever near the crosswalk. Does this happen to others?
    I still do drivers the courtesy of waiting at the curb until one who has the ability to stop without leaving tire marks or being rear-ended stops for me. In general, I have found most drivers to be courteous when I wait for them to stop.

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to comments@baristanet.com. For trouble with registration or commenting, write to comments@baristanet.com.

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

I would love to see Santorum get the nod. Maybe then the politically comatose members of society will wake up.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

Baristanet on Flickr