What’s Going On With Montclair’s Construction Office?

BY  |  Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 9:05am  |  COMMENTS (8)

A month ago, a small political bombshell dropped at 205 Claremont Ave. when Robert McLoughlin, about to be terminated as the town’s construction official, demanded his job back — saying otherwise he would tell the state about Mayor Jerry Fried had used political interference on behalf of developers around town.

McLoughlin didn’t get his job back, and he did report the town to the state. Meanwhile, the mayor and town manager Marc Dashield framed the decision to let McLoughlin go as a cost-cutting measure and told of a plan to contract with Glen Ridge to do construction inspections for Montclair.

A month later — at the busiest time of the year in the construction business — Montclair is no further toward an agreement with Glen Ridge, and the construction office is hobbling through with an interim officer, Phil Buchoo, and a part-time electrical inspector. McLoughlin, former fire chief for the town, did electrical inspections as well as running the construction office. Inspections, which are supposed to be conducted within 72 hours of a contractors’ request according to state regulations, are now taking as long as two weeks to schedule.

Someone requesting an electrical inspection this past Tuesday, June 14 would have been told that the first available date was Wednesday June 29.

“I’m aware that there are issues with scheduling inspections,” said Janice Talley, planning director for Montclair. “Are we at peak efficiency? No. [But] I haven’t received any complaints from contractors.”

“I don’t know any place where people can do it within 72 hours,” said Marc Dashield, township manager. He added that “we’ve had discussions” with Glen Ridge and “we’re still working on it.” He hopes to present a shared-services plan to the council at its next meeting, July 12.

Michael Rohal, administrator for Glen Ridge, confirmed that “We had preliminary discussions about a shared services agreement” but said no deal has been reached.

“I was sorry to see Bob McLoughlin let go,” said Montclair builder Jack Finn. “He really pulled that office together. It ran smoother. I felt that he raised the bar. He held people to a high standard.”

But Finn added, “He was not a soft and fuzzy kind of guy and he probably stepped on people’s toes.”

As for the lag in scheduling inspections, Finn said, “You learn to think ahead and plan ahead.”

Another builder, who was no fan of McLoughlin personally, acknowledged that McLoughlin “made the office run better” than previous construction officials. Even under McLoughlin’s stewardship, though, the town rarely made the 72-hour inspection scheduling deadline, he said.

Developer Cary Heller said there is “enormous backlog” in the system and speculated that scheduling delays may “cause people to go underground” and bypass the inspection process altogether.

The state is investigating McLoughlin’s charges but will not comment until the probe is complete.

McLoughlin was receiving a pension from his former fire chief position while collecting a salary as construction official.

 

 

 

 

 

Related Posts:

8 Comments

  1. POSTED BY pat gilleran  |  June 16, 2011 @ 9:55 am

    Dear MONTCLAIR,

    Please consider BLOOMFIELD for shared services in this instance. We have a wonderful Building Department that handles 4,500 inspections a year.

    Annual Inspection Volume
    Residential, commercial and industrial construction
    • 2,200 building, electric, plumbing and fire inspections.
    • 3,000 property maintenance inspections.
    • 500 certificate of occupancy inspections.

    Annual Zoning Inspections
    About 1,000 – for property use, setbacks, lot coverage, etc.

    read about this GREAT BLOOMFIELD department here on page 6
    http://www.bloomfieldtwpnj.com/documents/file/BUZZ,%20Winter%202009.pdf

  2. POSTED BY herbeverschmel  |  June 16, 2011 @ 10:18 am

    In the very least, if you are going to let an employee in charge a department go, you owe it to the people of Montclair to have a replacement strategy in place. It is obvious they didn’t which more than ever leads me to believe McLoughlin was tossed out over night as result of politics.Just my opinion.

  3. POSTED BY Howard Beale  |  June 16, 2011 @ 10:44 am

    Maybe contractors aren’t complaining because it falls on deaf ears. I have a small project going on at my house that is taking months because of long wait times for each required inspection. I’m patient with the contractor because I know what’s not happening in the construction department. And Janice Talley can consider this a complaint.

  4. POSTED BY kay  |  June 16, 2011 @ 11:15 am

    Herb, I think you are 100% correct on that assessment! IMO, no contingency plan = knee-jerk decision!

  5. POSTED BY Right of Center  |  June 16, 2011 @ 11:31 am

    It’s Mr. Dashield’s job to keep the local government running. No excuses. If he can’t manage that, it’s time for him to be replaced.

  6. POSTED BY agideon  |  June 16, 2011 @ 11:48 am

    When this story first came out, I was sceptical of McLoughlin’s claims. I was one of those wondering why he only waited until then to come forward over what he claimed was ongoing abuse of office.

    However, the fact that Montclair’s government was so unprepared for what was supposed to be a well considered financial choice has done a lot to change my mind. Clearly, this wasn’t “well considered” or even considered much at all.

    …Andrew

  7. POSTED BY silentnomore  |  June 16, 2011 @ 10:29 pm

    And when you see the mayor traipsing into Dick Grabowski’s office in the weeks before the move, and having Dick brag about getting McLoughlin fired, it makes you wonder even more.

  8. POSTED BY sohobound  |  June 17, 2011 @ 12:19 pm

    I think we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg with the lack of “managing” that is going on. The debt is through the roof, many surrounding towns are making major changes it reduce costs and Montclair barely tweaks things yet praises themselves for the hard work they’ve done and then raise taxes, yet again. They can get away with it because citizens are too busy working like dogs to pay their property taxes or getting their house ready to go on the market.

    The Town Council made mention of a petition at the last town council meeting. I think it was Nick who said, “there are a lot of signatures on this petition. It filled the page, maybe 30″. Why is it that CCM has a petition with about 1,000 signatures and the Town Council, except Cary, acts like there is no urgency to reduce the cost structure of the town to provide property tax relief?

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to comments@baristanet.com. For trouble with registration or commenting, write to comments@baristanet.com.

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

I'm starting to see that our political strife on this planet and definitely here on B'net is due to a lack or abundance of Oxytocin. We can't help what we do or think, our bodies, dna, etc. are running the show. We are meat puppets to our hormonal & chemical urges. In the words of the immortal Bela Lugosi...."Pull dee string, pull dee string!" PAZ in Ed Wood land.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

New Jersey Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com
Click here to add this map to your website.