Poll: Should Christie Chisel Away at the “Botax”?

BY  |  Tuesday, Jan 17, 2012 9:00am  |  COMMENTS (7)

Governor Chris Christie’s state of the state address – postponed last week due to the sudden death of Assembly Minority Leader Alex DeCroce – will take place today at 3 p.m.  Baristanet will stream it live.

The governor will be touting his accomplishments and addressing important and contentious issues like gay marriage and the minimum wage.  But one, dare we say, superficial item on the legislative agenda that has been attracting a bit of attention is Bill S1988, which seeks to eliminate the sales tax on plastic surgery.

The bill, which won unanimous approval by the Assembly last week, would phase out the “Botax” on boob jobs, neck lifts and other types of cosmetic surgery by 2013.  Currently, New Jersey is the only state that taxes such procedures.

According to the Office of Legislative Services, the tax nets the state around $10 million a year; but the bill’s supporters – among them  The New Jersey Society of Plastic Surgeons – claim that the tax drives patients to have procedures in New York or Pennsylvania, robbing the Garden State (and plastic surgeons) of additional revenue.

The story was even covered yesterday by NPR’s All Things Considered (listen to it here).

What do you think, Baristaville: should Christie sign the bill in an effort to keep those nips and tucks in Jersey?  Or should he take out his veto stamp?

Photo by EverJean via Flickr.

Related Posts:

7 Comments

  1. POSTED BY Hildy Fox  |  January 17, 2012 @ 9:31 am

    There’s a tax on boob jobs? Who knew! I had no idea the state of NJ is funded in part by my own little hooters. And to think I was worried about being selfish and superficial. Now I realize I was doing my part to help the poor and underprivileged, plus now I look great in those tight t shirts I wear to my kids’ school parties for the hot stay at home dads.

  2. POSTED BY Right of Center  |  January 17, 2012 @ 10:08 am

    There should not be a tax on any medical procedures, it only drives people to other states and makes the cost more expensive. Not all plastic surgery is superficial.

  3. POSTED BY nickcharles  |  January 17, 2012 @ 10:36 am

    it only drives people to other states and makes the cost more expensive

    Somehow I’m not going to take the plastic surgeons’ word for it that the “botax” is driving people to other states. Take Botox: if a procedure costs $500, the NJ tax on it is…$30. Who is going to drive into NYC — where parking alone may be more than that — to avoid the tax?

  4. POSTED BY jcunningham  |  January 17, 2012 @ 11:53 am

    …this is what passes for a health care debate in NJ…sigh…

  5. POSTED BY Right of Center  |  January 17, 2012 @ 12:17 pm

    Thank goodness jcunningham deigns to stop by to enrich the conversation by telling us our discourse is beneath him. A prince among men, cunningham! As always!

  6. POSTED BY jcunningham  |  January 17, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

    yes, i wish i had the time and inclination to gin up phony concern for every issue like you, ROC…

    you’re such a cute curmudgeon—you missed me!

  7. POSTED BY paolo  |  January 17, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

    Are penis enlargement procedures subject to sales tax?

    Instead of pandering to yet another interest group, the plastic surgeons in this case, perhaps NJ should extend the state income tax to cover the economic value of employer paid health insurance in excess of a certain threshold. First $5,000 of employer paid premiums is tax free, anything over that is ordinary income.

    Use that amount to fund childhood immunizations, school medical programs, etc.

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to comments@baristanet.com. For trouble with registration or commenting, write to comments@baristanet.com.

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

More liberal lunacy. And no mention of the tree ordinance? (you will no longer be in charge of the landscaping of your property). No mention of the Bike Locker ordinance rearing it's ugly head again? I imagine the pay-reaises for non-union employees is a moot issue. Given the proclivities of the incoming council, there probably won't be non-union employees much longer.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

New Jersey Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com
Click here to add this map to your website.